On 03/04/2012 07:22 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote: > > Makes one wonder, though... from an OO perspective, does it make sense > to have overridable non-function members? What semantics would (should) > that have? > Yes, it does make sense. const/immutable/(final) fields can be covariant. OTOH, it is not evident that it would be extremely useful.