allocate array with new
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Wed May 16 09:52:33 PDT 2012
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:51:59 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Well, the D GC is conservative, and will always be at least partly
> conservative. So freeing memory manually is not really a crime.
The idea with a GC is that it's supposed to manage the memory allocated
through it. So, if you're worrying about freeing GC memory, you're fighting the
GC and how it works. And unless you're keeping very close track of the number
of reference to a particular chunk of memory, freeing it manually is
dangerous. So, anyone looking to use delete is generally going about things
the wrong way.
However, it _is_ true that sometimes you need to intervene in order to get
sections of code as performant as they need to be (particularly since D's
current GC is not the most performant), which is part of the reason that
core.memory provides what it does. But it should generally be something used
when it's clear that you need that extra performance, not as a matter of
course, because using it is inherently unsafe. If there's something that you
know ahead of time needs to have more deterministic deallocation, then it's
probably better to be use malloc and free with ref-counting than trying to
manually manage GC memory.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list