template ref parameter

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 13:09:05 Jack Applegame wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 12:05:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> > In one case the function expects a pointer and in one case it
> > expects a int value. The assembly code of the two functions is
> > different and does different things.
> 
> Of course. And it is mean that ref indeed is a part of type.

storage classes on function parameters affect the type of the function, but 
they do not affect the type of the parameter. If a function has a parameter 
named foo, then typeof(foo) is going to be the same whether ref is on it or 
not.

- Jonathan M Davis