First experience with Threads
Ali Çehreli
acehreli at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 6 06:49:35 PDT 2012
On 10/06/2012 06:17 AM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> if the records and structures
> never need to touch eachother, there's no reason they cannot be handled
> on separate cores/threads (or that's my logic on it anyways).
Have you considered std.parallelism? If you can represent the data as a
slice, then a parallel foreach loop on that data is all you need:
foreach (data; parallel(dataSlice)) {
// ... each data will be handled individually in parallel ...
}
There is the following chapter about that module, which covers most of
std.parallelism:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/parallelism.html
Even though I have made a second pass to include the
appearently-newly-added features, there are some features of
std.parallelism that are missing in the chapter.
Although you don't seem to need it, there is also message passing
concurrency:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/concurrency.html
Ali
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list