move object from heap to stack
monarch_dodra
monarchdodra at gmail.com
Thu Sep 20 07:03:01 PDT 2012
On Thursday, 20 September 2012 at 12:32:03 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> So I should disable the copy ctor (@disable this(this)) and
> drop move, right?
Yes, but at that point, what you have is scoped!T re-implemented
:/
> As you can See if I pass a OnStack to function/class i'm using
> .get all the Time.
You could "alias get this". This way, your OnStack will call cast
as a T implicitly. Again, this is what scoped!T does.
> The only other method IMO would be to pass it as OnStack by
> value and Store it in the other class also as OnStack, right?
Yes, but that would require a copy contructor "this(this)", which
we have actually ruled out. You can pass the T itself thanks to
the implicit cast to T, but you can't pass an actual OnStack
object.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list