alias to a property as an argument to a mixin template
monarch_dodra
monarchdodra at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 00:01:29 PDT 2012
On Sunday, 23 September 2012 at 21:44:20 UTC, comco wrote:
>> [SNIP]
>> Now we can implement our rotate in terms of reassign:
>>
>> void rotate(node* u) {
>> auto v = u.right;
>> reassign(u.right, v.left, u);
>> }
>> This works and is general enough, but notice the duplication
>> of u.right. I don't like it - this may become an arbitrary
>> large expression.
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>> void rotate(node* u) {
>> node* v;
>> mixin ReassignMixin!(v, u.right, v.left, u);
>> reassign();
>> }
>>
>> See how the client code looks nicer when the template
>> arguments are not wrapped as strings.
I just don't see neither the problem, nor how the proposed
solution is any better.
All I see is a clean, closed and finished rotate at first, and
then... something else...
Relate:
BR 8718 I just filed:
Template mixin + string mixin name collision
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8718
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list