std.container: RedBlackTree questions

[John Colvin]

On Thursday, 1 August 2013 at 12:27:51 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
> On a relevant note, I find the unittests of RedBlackTree a bit 
> excessive even when they compile successfully.  They seem to 
> test the integrity of the whole tree every time a tree 
> operation takes place, and that makes the unittests version of 
> my local code run too slowly.  Is there a way to turn unittests 
> on only for user code and turn them off for the standard 
> library?
>
> Ivan Kazmenko.

Unless you've compiled phobos with -unittest, the unittests in 
the standard library won't even exist in the binary, let alone 
take up time to run.

Unless... I'm mistaken and actually for some bizarre reason 
unittests get dragged in from the import files, but that seems 
very unlikely.