Any trick for defining an operator overload in a different namespace?
Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Sat Aug 31 03:07:45 PDT 2013
I'm trying to achieve the syntax "opts[...] = 123", rather than using
the more direct "this[...] = 123". I can use this code:
-----
class C
{
this()
{
opts = Opts(this);
opts["foo"] = 1;
}
struct Opts
{
C c;
void opIndexAssign(T)(T value, string option)
{
c.assign(option, value);
}
}
Opts opts;
private void assign(string option, int value)
{
}
}
void main()
{
auto c = new C();
}
-----
But this explicitly stores the 'this' reference in the struct, I was
wondering if anyone knows of a trick to avoid having to do that. As
you can tell I just want a more convenient operator-based syntax over
calling the 'assign' method, but I don't want the operator to live in
the class space itself (because then I'd have to use "this[...] =
that", which is a little quirky for my taste).
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list