About compiler memory consumption

[Puming]

On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 at 16:12:28 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Puming:
>
>> My question is, is there a plan for this effort?
>
> There are plans to reduce memory used by CTFE, but template 
> bloat is less easy to face.

Vibe's diet templates would benefit from this I guess.

>
>> What is the  general prediction of an ideal D compiler,
>> some hundreds of MBs or less?
>
> Non one knows, I think.

That is a pity.

>
>
>> but a simple binary in vibe.d yields a ~12MB file,
>> it's somewhat slow to upload it.
>
> There are programs to compress binaries a lot.
>

Thanks for the tip, now I'll just need a little script to do the 
compress/rsync/decompress automation.

Did you mean tar/zip or some specialized tool? I found that tar 
makes it to ~2.5MB, which is fairly good

>
>> So I wonder can we refer vibe.d/phobos as a dynamic library?
>
> This is being worked on in the latest D releases.

That is great news. Would it be out in 2.065? ore 2.066?

>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Thanks bearophile,

So hopefully the situation might be much better earlier next year 
:-)