On Thursday, 12 December 2013 at 15:35:52 UTC, bearophile wrote: > Ali Çehreli: > >> But look at the assertion: the type of the *slice* arr2 is >> int[3]. :) > > I didn't notice that. It looks strange... I don't understand it. > > Bye, > bearophile I already pointed out why it was that way AND that it's "fixed" now. ;)