const method and return type

[Ali Çehreli]

On 12/13/2013 04:30 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:

 > There's some discussion that auto might strip off the top level
 > const where it is otherwise allowed, but I'm not sure if that's
 > actually going to happen or not.

Ah. I was about to respond by "that top level const is silly" but I now 
see that it is true only when no mutable reference is involved. So, in 
order to keep things simple, now I think that the current behavior is 
better.

Ali