On 2/17/13 7:25 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Sunday, February 17, 2013 23:00:19 Michael wrote: >>> That's not the meaning of static in that context. >> >> As I understand a static class can't be instantiated. > > I have no idea how you came to that conclusion. Probably because of this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/79b3xss3(v=vs.80).aspx