goto (outer) case
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 18 19:51:06 PST 2013
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:45:29 -0500, Nick Sabalausky
<SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:30:48 -0500
> "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hm.. wouldn't plain goto work:
>>
>> > final switch(foo)
>> > {
>> > case Foo.a:
>> > final switch(bar)
>> > {
>> > case Bar.bar:
>> > goto HORRIBLE_HACK;
>> > break;
>> > }
>> > break;
>> >
>> > case Foo.b:
>> > HORRIBLE_HACK:
>> > break;
>> > }
>>
>> Not sure, didn't test.
>>
>
> Maybe, but as you say it's a "horrible hack", and since my motivation
> was for some code cleanup it's just kind of a wash.
My love for goto is not great. I cringe using goto case even ;)
That being said, I have no problem using it when the situation calls for
it. If there's one thing I hate more than goto, it's copy-pasting code,
especially in the same function. If goto avoids that, I'm for it.
Especially in an embedded project.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list