A little of coordination for Rosettacode

FG home at fgda.pl
Wed Feb 27 03:47:13 PST 2013


On 2013-02-26 15:10, bearophile wrote:
> This third version is much simpler and it seems good enough for
> Rosettacode:
>
> http://codepad.org/YJjb1t91

Nice. Myself I'd add bits.reverse; after the N.iota.map..., because I'm more 
used to a truth table where the left-most operands iterate the slowest.



More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list