Inner function overload bug?

[Era Scarecrow]

On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 12:03:30 UTC, dennis luehring 
wrote:
> Am 08.01.2013 22:43, schrieb Era Scarecrow:
>> That just means my unittest wouldn't work, so either it has to 
>> be global or inside a struct/union/class (and global is not 
>> very likely).
>>
>>   Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>
> isn't that some sort of hijacking then?

  Not sure how you mean, and I'm not sure how you would hi-Jack 
it. It's a nested function, and shares no names with anything 
else, private to the unittest; But the requirement to put it 
inside a struct although semi-restrictive isn't enough of an 
issue to rant about. Nested functions would probably be for 
recursive or helper functions (lambdas?) and wouldn't need 
overloading anyways.