Inner function overload bug?

[Era Scarecrow]

On Friday, 11 January 2013 at 01:49:03 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 10:12 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>> "Nested functions cannot be overloaded."
>
> Note that this is a case of the spec being adapted to the 
> implementation. It has been added after I complained about the 
> DMD behaviour.

  So it's just clarification to be correct because the frontend 
does it? Doesn't seem quite right... It breaks a certain level of 
consistency; Although need for such overloading is likely close 
to nil anyways.