randomShuffle

[Diggory]

On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 21:48:49 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 01:03 PM, Diggory wrote:
>> Still a few places to optimise, and I think the compiler 
>> optimisation should be
>> able to give a decent speed up as well. Would be interested to 
>> see how it
>> compares in your benchmark!
>
> VERY belated apologies for not getting back to you here.  I was 
> preparing an
> email on the nice features of RandomSample -- e.g. that you can 
> use it to sample
> lines from a file -- when I realized that actually there was a 
> bug that stopped
> you from doing that:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10265
>
> So I stopped to prepare a fix, and then I got distracted with a 
> bunch of things
> I realized could be done to improve std.random ... :-P
>
> Anyway, I _will_ do the benchmark.  Just might be a little 
> while.

Haha, no problem!