Trouble with lockstep

[Craig Dillabaugh]

On Monday, 24 June 2013 at 14:33:48 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Craig Dillabaugh:
>
>>   foreach( idx, count; lockstep( iota!ubyte(ubyte.min,
>> ubyte.max), bins ) )
>
> Also note that doesn't iterate the whole ubyte range. Maybe we 
> need another iota range for that, with a different name or with 
> an optional template argument string like "[]" as 
> std.random.uniform. Opinions welcome.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Opps.  Of course.

The optional template argument sounds like a good idea.

Any idea why the original wouldn't compile though?

Craig