typeof map

[cal]

On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 at 06:58:33 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 at 04:26:00 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
>> I think it's because each lambda litteral is treated unique.
>> can dmd be changed to recognize identical lambda litterals as 
>> identical? Is
>> there any particular issue making that difficult?
>> it already recognizes identical string literals as identical
>
> I could be wrong, but the difference might be that it *can* 
> recognize string literals as idential, but it doesn't actually 
> guarantee it as spec. This is not an issue for strings, but...

I also thought it was to do with identical lambda literals being 
unique, and that the code should have compiled, but I've changed 
my mind after seeing your argument.