No monitor for immutable class instances?
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 11 20:59:58 PDT 2013
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:54:46 -0400, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com>
wrote:
> Maybe a stupid question: an immutable class instance can't change, so is
> it possible and is it a good idea to remove (to not add) the monitor
> pointer field from immutable class instances, saving memory and allowing
> them to store one more word in the same amount of memory?
Both immutable and mutable cast to const. A const function may be
accessing mutable data in a read-only fashion, but it still may need to
lock the monitor. Therefore, you must still be able to lock an immutable
object.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list