cannot have overloaded nested functions?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 01:15:06 Timothee Cour wrote:
> > as far as I can tell, it means exactly what it says, and I don't know how
> 
> it could be friendlier.
> 
> the error message 'declaration fun is already defined' is surprising
> because 'void fun(int x);' and 'void fun();' are typically 2 different
> function declarations, having different signatures. So this this sounds
> misleading/surprising.
> 
> > if you have a good suggestion as to improve the error message, please
> 
> create an enhancement request for it
> 
> how about:
> 
> 'cannot overload a function in a nested scope'

Sounds fine to me. Open an enhancement request for it.

- Jonathan M Davis