Small troubles with "private"

[John J]

On 11/05/2013 11:00 AM, bearophile wrote:
> How to solve such little troubles? A possible idea is to add to D
> another attribute, a kind of "private private" that is enforced inside
> the same module. It could be named "super private" because D has the
> "super" keyword :-) But this idea doesn't solve all the problems,
> because sometimes you don't want to use a super private attribute.
>


How about "strict private"