Small troubles with "private"

[Jesse Phillips]

On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 16:00:43 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> How to solve such little troubles? A possible idea is to add to 
> D another attribute, a kind of "private private" that is 
> enforced inside the same module. It could be named "super 
> private" because D has the "super" keyword :-) But this idea 
> doesn't solve all the problems, because sometimes you don't 
> want to use a super private attribute.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

I don't think such problems are valuable to solve.