Unexpected behavior when misusing inline assembly

Noah nesanter at knox.edu
Tue Nov 12 10:23:36 PST 2013


Just realized I forgot to delete the 7 and the x from inside the
function calls.  Question is the same, though.

On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 18:22:46 UTC, Noah wrote:
> When running the following code:
>
> __gshared void* return_ptr;
> __gshared void* injected_fn = &fn;
>
> void main() {
>     buffer(7);
>     printf("End main\n");
> }
>
> void buffer() {
>     test(x);
>     printf("End buffer\n");
> }
>
> void test() {
>     printf("This is a test!\n");
>     inject();
>     printf("End of the test!\n");
> }
>
> void fn() {
>     printf("Hello, world!\n");
>     asm {
>         mov RAX, return_ptr;
>         mov [RBP+8], RAX;
>     }
> }
>
> void inject() {
>     asm {
>         naked;
>         push RAX;
>         mov RAX, [RBP+8];
>         mov return_ptr, RAX;
>         mov RAX, injected_fn;
>         mov [RBP+8], RAX;
>         pop RAX;
>         ret;
>     }
> }
>
> The program behaves as expected, that is, the program prints
> This is a test!
> End of the test!
> Hello, world!
> End buffer
> End main
>
> However, if I call test directly from main, it results in a 
> segfault.
> If I call inject directly from main, it works.
> And, oddly, if I add any amount of inline assembler to main, 
> and call test there, it works.
>
> Could anyone explain to me what's going on?


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list