Optional out parameter of function
Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Wed Nov 27 02:41:36 PST 2013
On 27/11/13 11:15, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Personally, I think that it's by far the best approach to just do
>
> int foo(int i)
> {
> int j;
> return foo(i, j);
> }
>
> It's clean, and I really don't see a big problem with it.
Yea, that's really the conclusion I had already come to. I emailed the list
because I wondered if there was a friendly syntax to enable one to quietly drop
a parameter, as one might do for an in-parameter.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list