I cannot understand problem with argument of the function

[mrd]

On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 10:59:11 UTC, monarch_dodra 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 10:37:29 UTC, mrd wrote:
>> Is the contract does not uses its own version of arguments?
>> What is the point of passing earlier changed arguments into 
>> contract block?
>
> That's a good question. I'll raise it on the main boards.

Here is simplified file that reproduces this bug (or not bug):

http://pastebin.com/0QRZcts8

$ ./bug
Inside of body: value=300 type=ulong
Inside of out contract: value=2 type=ulong result=[172, 2]