Trouble with destroy

[Meta]

On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:11:53 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> As always. As soon as you wrote it, you've got the solution.
> ----
> destroy!A(a);
> ----

This still seems like it should be worth reporting. I can't 
remember... Is partial ordering done between multiple matching 
template functions like it is with regular functions? If so, 
there should be no ambiguity in choosing the second one.