On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 17:03:23 UTC, Timothee Cour via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Is there a reason why 'with(Foo):' is not allowed, and we have 
> to
> use with(Foo){...} ?
> It would be more in line with how other scope definitions work 
> (extern(C)
> etc)
ping, anyone?