Appender is ... slow

[monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 12:08:58 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via 
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Hmm, what about a sort of linked list of static arrays, that 
> allocates
> a new one when necessary?

Appender is not a container, and has no freedom on the data it 
manipulates. It has to be able to accept an array as input, and 
when it is finished, it needs to be able to return an actual 
array, so that's arguably out of the question.