core.thread.Fiber --- runtime stack overflow unlike goroutines
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Fri Aug 15 08:25:22 PDT 2014
On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 14:45:02 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 14:28:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>
>> Won't that kind of kill the purpose of Fiber as low-cost
>> context abstraction? Stack size does add up for thousands of
>> fibers.
>
> As long as allocation speed is fast for large allocs (which I
> have to test), I want to change the default size to be very
> large. The virtual address space in a 64-bit app is enormous,
> and if the memory is committed on demand then physical memory
> use should only match what the user actually requires. This
> should allow us to create millions of fibers and not overrun
> system memory, and also not worry about stack overruns, which
> has always been a concern with the default fiber stack size.
No, I was referring to the proposal to supply bigger stack size
to Fiber constructor - AFAIR it currently does allocate that
memory eagerly (and does not use any OS CoW tools), doesn't it?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list