DIP64 - Regarding 'pure' and 'nothrow'

[Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 13:49:48 UTC, Aerolite wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I just read the wiki article on DIP64 -
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP64
>
> The discrepancy between the annotation-style attributes such as
> '@safe', '@property', etc and the keyword attributes 'pure' and
> 'nothrow' has always really bugged me ever since I started using
> D.
>
> How likely is it that DIP64 will be accepted and implemented? 
> Or,
> more specifically, how much does this discrepancy bother others,
> including Walter and Andrei? Or is the author of this DIP wrong
> in his assessment that 'pure' and 'nothrow' are in fact standard
> attributes?

I bothers the heck outta my OCD. :)