std.range.equal or == in isPalindrome

[Per Nordlöw" <per.nordlow at gmail.com>]

On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 at 10:47:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Stanislav Blinov:
>
>> Range interface should be minimal.
>
> I agree. But I didn't mean to ask for that operator in the 
> Range protocol. I think some ranges should define a ~ operator. 
> It's easy to write a "chainable" trait. I did that for my 
> nonstandard D1 library.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Could you post the isChainable trait?

I'm curious :)

/Per