A little of coordination for Rosettacode
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Wed Feb 26 04:58:25 PST 2014
Stanislav Blinov:
> You'd also have to synchronize access to id member,
> I forgot to note that both synchronized {} blocks should also
> be synchronizing on the same mutex.
> The mutex could be emulated with a shared bool and
> std.atomic.cas(). That would get rid of synchronized{} blocks
> and would potentionally be faster.
This is the current D entry:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rendezvous#D
If you have bug fixes, or improvements, it's better to do them
right there. Of if you don't want to register on that site, you
can put the modified version in dpaste, and I'll upload it on
Rosettacode.
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list