Universal Construction Syntax for Pointers?

Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Fri Jun 13 23:39:56 PDT 2014


On 06/13/2014 10:29 PM, Meta wrote:
> I thought this was possible, but DMD 2.065 doesn't allow it, saying "no
> constructor for int":
>
> int* p = new int(3);
>
> Is something like this planned for the future? I know we can already do:
>
> int n = int(3);

Those both compile with 2.066

Ali



More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list