Comparison operator overloading
Márcio Martins via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Mon Dec 7 03:36:38 PST 2015
On Monday, 7 December 2015 at 00:43:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 12/06/2015 06:41 AM, Márcio Martins wrote:
>
> > auto m = (a > b) * a + 15;
> > auto c = a.choose(a > b)^^2;
>
> What do those operations do? Are you thinking of a special
> meaning for '>', perhaps common in numerical computations,
> which I'm not familiar with?
>
> If I understand correctly, 'a > b' in choose(a > b) is the
> condition to pick elements from a. If so, it is better to pass
> a lambda in such cases:
>
> a.choose!((i, j) => i > j);
>
> However, as I understand it, the whole expression is supposed
> to generate an array-like result. Is that right? :)
>
> Ali
Yes, each expression involving these arrays will almost always
also result in another array, sometimes with a different type.
For example, a > b returns an array of bools whose elements are
the the result of the condition applied to each individual
element of a and b.
This makes writing numerical code very easy, and with fewer bugs,
because it's all very succinct and each operation is very simple
and well defined.
My initial intuition was that opBinary and opBinaryRight would be
used if suitable and opCmp/opEquals would be the fallback. That
didn't seem to work, so I quickly realised this is not possible
in D. I'm wondering if it is an oversight in the language design
or there are real reasons for this limitation?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list