reflect on this function

[Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 22:44:35 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> can you go with `relationImpl` and mixin/template that generates
> `relation` with contract then? something like:
>
>   @reflexive @transitive bool relationImpl (T)(T a, T b) { ... }
>   alias relation = buildWithContracts!relationImpl;
>
> then you can simply call `relationImpl` in your out section.

Yeah, this looks pretty good. As much as I hate the pimpl idiom, 
having a one-liner alias right next to the definition should 
minimize the eye-bleeding. Thanks!