Template function type inference with default arguments

[Meta via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 4 January 2015 at 00:22:01 UTC, ixid wrote:
> Why don't templates take a type from the default argument if 
> nothing else is supplied? It would be useful to be able to use 
> an enum to set a default.

I doubt anyone's ever thought of that particular use-case. Using 
your typeof(MAX) workaround is probably as good as it's going to 
get for the time being.