Static constructors guaranteed to run?

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:42:31 +0000, Marc Schütz wrote:

> The behaviour you expect makes more sense, for sure, but I was trying to
> guess what the current implementation might be doing without actually
> having to try it :-)

ah, sorry. i was talking about "the ideal case with ideal compiler", not 
about current state of things. ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20150701/295dea6a/attachment-0001.sig>