On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 19:30:08 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> Both variants are wrong because uniq needs sorted ranges.
>
> Probably you need something like that:
>
> x = x.chain(y).sort.uniq.array;
Interesting.
Is
     x = x.chain(y).sort
faster than
     x ~= y;
     x.sort;
?
If so why?