shared array?

[Prudence via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 17:16:02 UTC, ponce wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 17:00:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
> Grøstad wrote:
>> On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 16:53:20 UTC, ponce wrote:
>>> GC is basically ok for anything soft-realtime, where you 
>>> already spend a lot of time to go fast enough. And if you 
>>> want hard-realtime, well you wouldn't want malloc either.
>>>
>>> It's a non-problem.
>>
>> If this was true then Go would not have a concurrent collector.
>
> I was speaking of the D language.

Of course, that makes it make sense!