Rebind template(bug?)

[Engine Machine via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 19:09:34 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
> On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 18:04:43 UTC, Engine Machine wrote:
>> How do you seriously think this is cleaner/simpler?
> 1. No extra encrypted things, such as InstantiateOrEmptySeq
> 2. Much more understandable.
>
>> You have two classes.
> No. I have one template with two specializations. Class 
> template and class is not the same thing.
>
>> Their is no uniformity between them.
> They have the same name. This is the best uniformity.
>
>> You have uniformity between all the derived classes then have 
>> a special case for the base class. A certain easy to follow 
>> pattern is set up but needlessly break it for one case. Why?
> Because it is the base class. It has no parent. Also this is 
> the standard and well known pattern in template metaprogramming.

I'm sorry if it confuses you... it doesn't confuse me. I do not 
know why you have to try and prove something that is a 
preference. Do you often get in to arguments with people about 
how ford is better than chevy or blonds are better than brunettes?