is increment on shared ulong atomic operation?

[Minas Mina via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 19:43:23 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 19:39:27 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
>> On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 19:27:19 UTC, Charles Hixson 
>> wrote:
>>> If I define a shared ulong variable, is increment an atomic 
>>> operation?
>>> E.g.
>>>
>>> shared ulong t;
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> t++;
>>>
>>> It seems as if it ought to be, but it could be split into 
>>> read, increment, store.
>>>
>>> I started off defining a shared struct, but that seems silly, 
>>> as if the operations defined within a shared struct are 
>>> synced, then the operation on a shared variable should be 
>>> synced, but "+=" is clearly stated not to be synchronized, so 
>>> I'm uncertain.
>>
>> https://dlang.org/phobos/core_atomic.html#.atomicOp
>
> Just noticed that there's no example.
> It's used like
>
> shared(ulong) a;
> atomicOp!"+="(a, 1);

Wow, that syntax sucks a lot.