std.concurrency: ownerTid vs thisTid
miazo via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 9 08:09:19 PST 2016
On Tuesday, 9 February 2016 at 15:55:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 07:52 AM, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>> It is OK, I guess the output is just mixed
>
> Yes, that's an important point but it is not the reason. (Just
> tested.)
>
> I think this is just an issue with how Tid objects are printed.
> Otherwise, everything works as expected and although they print
> the same value, "worker1 != worker2" is true as well.
>
> Ali
Well, I'm not concerned about the order of the output but the
actual values of these ids. Shouldn't it be rather:
owner: Tid(18fd58)
worker: Tid(24afe38)
owner: Tid(18fd58)
worker: Tid(24afe38)
or
owner: Tid(24afe38)
worker: Tid(18fd58)
owner: Tid(24afe38)
worker: Tid(18fd58)
?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list