Coverage

[Leandro Motta Barros via Digitalmars-d-learn]

I had one case these days in which I also had a lot of data to use in the
test. I was able to put the data as very large regular D arrays, but this
increased my compilation times a lot (not to mention the time to run the
unit tests).

I decided to enclose this specific unit test (including the `import
test_data` statement) in `version ExtraUnitTests { ... }`. This way, I can
run the bulk of my unit tests very frequently without wasting time with
this special case I want to run only sometimes.

I can't say I am 100% happy with this, but it worked for me and didn't
require any additional dependency.

LMB





On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 12:35:38 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>
>> You probably already though of it, but: can't you create a unittest that
>> calls your code as many times as desired, passing different input each time?
>>
>
> That is a viable option yes. I will probably end up doing it like that.
>
> I don't like it though. Since the input is pretty big, it would need to be
> kept in an external file. And I don't like my unittests reading files. Plus
> they aren't really unittests either. Oh well. Moving on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20160216/183b82aa/attachment-0001.html>