Simple performance question from a newcomer
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 23 06:35:37 PST 2016
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 11:10:40 UTC, ixid wrote:
> On Monday, 22 February 2016 at 15:43:23 UTC, dextorious wrote:
>> I do have to wonder, however, about the default settings of
>> dub in this case. Having gone through its documentation, I
>> might still not have guessed to try the compiler options you
>> provided, thereby losing out on a 2-3x performance
>> improvement. What build options did you use in your dub.json
>> that it managed to translate to the correct compiler switches?
>
> Your experience is exactly what the D community needs to get
> right. You've come in as an interested user with patience and
> initially D has offered slightly disappointing performance for
> both technical reasons and because of the different compilers.
His concern is with the default settings of Dub. I've tried Dub
and given up several times, and I've been using D since 2013. The
community needs to provide real documentation. It's embarrassing
that it's pushed as the official package manager and will soon be
included with DMD.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list