ErrnoException

[Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 01:31:56 UTC, Jirka wrote:

>
> Ok, that would throw some OOM exception instead so I wouldn't 
> need to bother with it, is there something else in the GC that 
> would override it during class instance allocation? I am 
> finding it weird that ErrnoException doesn't let you specify 
> the errno value explicitly, you usually check it in your code 
> anyway (e.g. for EINTR and repeat the operation and not throw 
> this error).

An additional constructor that accepts and errno value sounds 
like a good potential PR.