sliced().array compatibility with parallel?

[Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 01:46 +0000, Jay Norwood via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> 
[…]
>      // processed non-parallel works ok
>      foreach( dv; dv2){
>          if(dv != dv){ // test for NaN
>              return 1;
>          }
>      }
> 
>      // calculated parallel leaves out processing of many values
>      foreach( dv; dvp){
>          if(dv != dv){ // test for NaN
>              return 1;
>          }
>      }
>      return(0);
> }

I am not convinced these "Tests for NaN" actually test for NaN. I
believe you have to use isNan(dv).

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20160110/6dc7cbaf/attachment.sig>