ndslice, using a slice in place of T[] in template parameters
Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Sun Jan 10 16:50:37 PST 2016
On Monday, 11 January 2016 at 00:39:04 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 23:31:47 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
> wrote:
>> Just use normal arrays for buffer (median accepts array on
>> second argument for optimisation reasons).
>
> ok, I think I see. I created a slice(numTasks, bigd) over an
> allocated double[] dbuf, but slb[task] will be returning some
> struct instead of the double[] that i need in this case.
>
> If I add .array to the Slice, it does compile, and executes,
> but slower than using the buffer directly.
>
> medians[i] = median(vec, slb[task].array);
> parallel time medians msec:113
>
> original version using the computed slice of the original
> allocated dbuf.
> medians[i] = median(vec,dbuf[j .. k]);
> parallel time medians msec:85
>
> The .array appears to make a copy. Is there some other call in
> ndslice to return the double[] slice of the original array?
I will add such function. But it is not safe to do so (Slice can
have strides not equal to 1). So it is like a hack (&ret[0, 0,
0])[0 .. ret.elementsCount]).
Have you made comparison between my and yours parallel versions?
https://github.com/9il/examples/blob/parallel/image_processing/median-filter/source/app.d
-- Ilya
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list