free causes exception

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 21:21:29 UTC, Igor wrote:
> That shouldn't be the case. I allocate in a static method 
> called New once. I then deallocate in the destructor. Basically 
> just as one would do in C++.

You can't deallocate in destructor in C++, because an object can 
be embedded in another object, so if it's destructor deallocates 
itself, it will deallocate the container object before it 
finishes its destruction. It's delete operator that deallocates 
memory in C++.