ErrnoException

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 3/1/16 12:44 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 01:31:56 UTC, Jirka wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, that would throw some OOM exception instead so I wouldn't need to
>> bother with it, is there something else in the GC that would override
>> it during class instance allocation? I am finding it weird that
>> ErrnoException doesn't let you specify the errno value explicitly, you
>> usually check it in your code anyway (e.g. for EINTR and repeat the
>> operation and not throw this error).
>
> An additional constructor that accepts and errno value sounds like a
> good potential PR.

Yes, please file an enhancement request.

-Steve